A lawyer can be disciplined for stating an ability to influence government officials if that ability is:

A lawyer can face disciplinary action for claiming an ability to influence government officials if that ability is improperly assumed or implied. This is rooted in the ethical obligation that lawyers must adhere to regarding honest communication. When a lawyer asserts they can sway government officials, they must ensure that claim is based on truthful, transparent, and substantiated grounds. Claiming an ability that is not genuinely supported or could be interpreted to suggest unethical pressure or influence undermines the integrity of the legal profession. It can mislead clients and the public regarding the lawyer's capabilities and their respect for the legal processes.

In the context of the other choices, while a promise based on reputation might suggest exaggeration, and stating an ability without implication avoids the risk of deception, neither addresses the ethical breach inherent in making an unfounded claim. Similarly, past experience in legislation, while potentially relevant to a lawyer's credibility, does not automatically legitimize a claim of influence without clear and ethical backing. Thus, the focus on improper assumptions or implications is crucial to maintaining professional integrity and adhering to ethical standards in legal practice.