Under what circumstances should a judge consider divesting from investments and financial interests?

A judge should consider divesting from investments and financial interests primarily when frequent disqualification might be required. The integrity and impartial administration of justice are paramount in the role of a judge. If a judge holds financial interests that could lead to frequent disqualification from cases due to conflicts of interest, it undermines the legal process and the public's trust in the judicial system. By divesting from such interests, a judge can maintain their ability to hear cases without the concern of bias or the appearance of bias, adhering to ethical guidelines that prioritize fairness and objectivity.

The other options do not align with the ethical responsibilities judges have regarding their financial interests. Personal financial growth or being approached by a financial advisor does not inherently relate to the need for a judge to prioritize impartiality in their judicial role. Reporting finances annually serves compliance purposes but is not, by itself, a valid reason for divestment unless financial interests create conflicts that could impede the judge's impartiality.