Under what conditions can a lawyer accept payment for representation from someone who is not the client?

A lawyer can accept payment for representation from someone who is not the client under the condition that the client consents, and there is no interference with the lawyer's professional judgment. This aligns with ethical guidelines that emphasize the importance of maintaining the client-lawyer relationship's integrity. Consent ensures that the client is aware of and agrees to the arrangement, which respects their autonomy and decision-making capacity.

Moreover, the requirement that the lawyer's professional judgment must not be compromised is crucial. The attorney must remain objective and act in the best interests of the client, regardless of who is making the payment. This provision safeguards against potential conflicts of interest and ensures that the loyalty and advocacy of the lawyer remain solely with the client.

In contrast, other options do not align with ethical rules. Accepting a payment without consent could lead to conflicts of interest or disassociation from the client's wishes, which is why such arrangements are structured around the necessary consent from the client. A gift from the payor might imply an expectation of influence or favor, raising ethical concerns. Additionally, while a client’s incapacity might create unique circumstances, it does not inherently waive the need for consent regarding payments. Finally, a blanket allowance for payments at any time without requiring consent could jeopardize the integrity