What is a possible course of action for a lawyer if a client does not consent to a conflict of interest resolution?

When a lawyer faces a situation where a conflict of interest exists and the client does not give consent to the proposed resolution, the most ethical and appropriate course of action is to withdraw from representing the client. This adherence to ethical standards ensures that the lawyer avoids any situation that could compromise the client's interests or the integrity of the legal profession.

In the context of legal ethics, the duty of loyalty to the client is paramount. When a conflict arises, the lawyer must prioritize the client's interests. If the client does not consent to a resolution that would allow for continued representation without compromising ethical obligations, withdrawing becomes necessary to maintain professional responsibility and avoid potential harm to the client. It also protects the lawyer from liability or disciplinary action that could arise from continuing representation in the face of an unresolved conflict.

By choosing to withdraw, the lawyer acts in accordance with the rules of professional conduct that typically require lawyers to refrain from taking on or continuing representation that cannot be conducted impartially or without a conflict of interest. This action not only honors the ethical obligations but also allows the client an opportunity to seek representation that may better serve their interests free from conflicts.

The other options do not adequately address the ethical implications of continuing representation in such circumstances. Dismissing a client from representation may