What is a requirement for a judge when accepting a loan from a financial institution?

A judge must ensure that any loan they accept from a financial institution aligns with standard terms available to all borrowers. This requirement is grounded in the principle of avoiding any appearance of impropriety or partiality in their capacity as a judge. By adhering to terms that are standard for the general public, the judge demonstrates integrity and maintains public trust in the judicial system. Accepting a loan with terms that are not widely available creates the potential for favoritism and can undermine the judge's impartiality.

Other choices might suggest circumstances that could compromise a judge's ethical standing. For instance, seeking loans with favorable terms (choice A) could indicate preferential treatment, while requiring approval from a judicial committee (choice C) does not align with the guidelines governing judges. Lastly, having a loan underwritten by a family member (choice D) could further entangle the judge in conflicts of interest and appearance issues. Thus, the emphasis on standard terms ensures that judges act within the ethical boundaries expected of their role.