What must judges avoid regarding public comments related to elections?

Judges must maintain impartiality in their role, particularly concerning public comments about elections. Supporting candidates publicly undermines the judicial role, which is to remain neutral and avoid any appearance of bias. When judges express support for particular candidates, it can erode public confidence in the judiciary, suggesting that decisions may be influenced by personal political preferences rather than by the law and facts of a case.

Remaining aloof from partisan politics is essential for preserving the integrity of the judicial process. By refraining from public endorsements, judges uphold the principle of impartiality that is fundamental to their position. This impartiality fosters trust in the legal system, which is vital for the rule of law.

While expressing views in court, making partisan donations, and writing opinion pieces can carry their own ethical considerations, the most direct and significant conflict arises from publicly supporting candidates. This behavior may connect to issues of perceived bias and the overall credibility of the judiciary, making it particularly important for judges to abstain from such actions.