What should a judge do if their financial interests could lead to frequent disqualification?

A judge's responsibility is to maintain the integrity of the judiciary and ensure public confidence in the legal system. Frequent disqualification due to financial interests raises questions about the judge's impartiality and could undermine both their personal reputation and the court's credibility.

Divesting from financial interests that create a potential for frequent disqualification is a prudent and responsible approach. It helps to eliminate any conflict of interest and ensures the judge can perform their duties without bias or the appearance of bias. By divesting, the judge actively demonstrates a commitment to ethical standards and the principle of impartiality in the judiciary.

Maintaining financial interests despite potential conflicts undermines these principles and could lead to erosion of public trust in the legal system. Ignoring conflicts or transferring interests to a family member does not adequately resolve the issue, as it could still result in disqualification or perceived bias. Divesting is the most effective strategy for a judge to uphold ethical conduct and public confidence.