What should judges do to avoid conflicts of interest?

Judges have a fundamental obligation to maintain impartiality and integrity in their judicial roles. One effective way to uphold these standards and avoid conflicts of interest is to divest from interests that may conflict with their judicial duties. By removing or selling off investments that could potentially influence their decision-making, judges can help ensure that their rulings are based solely on the law and facts of a case, free from personal financial interests that could compromise their objectivity.

Divesting from conflicting interests is not only a proactive measure, but it also demonstrates a commitment to maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. This action helps reinforce the principle that judges must prioritize their responsibilities to the court and the legal system above personal gain or investments.

While keeping financial interests secret, updating financial interests regularly, or consulting with the public about personal interests might address transparency or awareness, they do not actively eliminate the potential for conflicts. Divesting is the most decisive and effective way to mitigate any risk of bias that could arise from financial interests, making it the most appropriate answer in this context.