Which of the following does NOT typically create a consentable conflict?

The selection of "Representation that jeopardizes a client’s case" as the correct answer highlights a fundamental principle in legal ethics concerning conflicts of interest. When a conflict of interest arises that threatens to jeopardize a client's case, it typically cannot be resolved through informed consent. This is largely because the attorney's duty is to act in the best interests of their client. If a representation inherently compromises the client's position, then the ethical responsibilities prevent the attorney from proceeding, regardless of any consent that might be offered.

In contrast, lawful representation of multiple parties, claims between clients in related proceedings, and scenarios involving informed consent can often be managed with the proper disclosures and safeguards. In these cases, if all parties understand the potential conflicts and give informed consent, an attorney may ethically proceed with the representation. However, when the potential for jeopardizing a client's case exists, such consent cannot rectify the problem, making it a scenario that typically does not create a consentable conflict.