Which of the following is allowed for judges or their family members regarding gifts?

Judges and their family members are subject to strict ethical guidelines concerning the acceptance of gifts to prevent any potential conflicts of interest or impropriety. Accepting a wedding gift from a relative is permissible because such gifts are generally considered personal in nature and are not associated with the official duties of the judge. This exception recognizes the familial relationship and the customary practice of giving gifts during significant life events like weddings.

In contrast, the other options are excluded from acceptable practices. Substantial gifts from any individual could create an appearance of favoritism or bias, thus undermining the integrity of the judicial system. Similarly, accepting loans from friends could lead to indebtedness that might affect a judge's impartiality. Finally, accepting gifts with no conditions attached is problematic because, although no specific quid-pro-quo may exist, it can still raise ethical concerns regarding the influence of such gifts on a judge's decision-making. Therefore, the acceptance of gifts in a personal context, especially from family, is treated differently, which is why receiving a wedding gift from a relative is allowed.