Which scenario may lead to a mandatory withdrawal from representation?

A mandatory withdrawal from representation occurs when a lawyer is faced with a direct violation of legal ethics rules. This situation involves circumstances where the attorney's continued representation would breach professional conduct standards or violate specific laws. Legal ethics provide that attorneys must act in accordance with the law and uphold their fiduciary duties to the court and their clients. For instance, if a lawyer were to discover that a client intends to commit perjury or engage in fraudulent activity, the lawyer is ethically obligated to cease representation to maintain the integrity of the legal process.

This scenario emphasizes the critical importance of adhering to ethical guidelines within the practice of law. Whereas changing lawyers, unreasonable requests, or lack of interest might be challenging issues in a client-attorney relationship, they do not inherently compel a mandatory withdrawal. In those cases, attorneys might consider withdrawing from representation but are not compelled by ethical rules to do so. Only in clear situations of violating ethical norms does the obligation to withdraw become involuntary and necessary.